EFF SLAMS HELEN SUZMAN FOUNDATION’S 'POLITICAL WITCH-HUNT' AGAINST JULIUS MALEMA
KASIBC_AFRICA — Sunday, 17 May 2026
Online Editor : Chanon Lecodey Merricks
The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) has fiercely condemned a fresh legal battle launched by the Helen Suzman Foundation (HSF), calling it a politically motivated attack aimed at stripping EFF President and Commander-in-Chief, Julius Malema, of his seat on the Judicial Service Commission (JSC).
The HSF has filed papers in the Western Cape High Court, demanding that Parliament step in and decide whether Malema is still "fit and proper" to serve on the JSC. The foundation claims that the CIC’s vocal criticism of certain judges and court rulings actively undermines the independence and integrity of South Africa's judiciary.
An Attack on Democratic Criticism and Free Speech
The EFF has hit back hard, labeling the court bid as a dangerous and dishonest attempt to muzzle elected leaders and criminalize free speech. According to the red berets, the HSF is trying to set a toxic precedent where Members of Parliament who dare to question or criticize the judiciary are locked out of critical constitutional oversight bodies.
The party completely rejects the myth that judges are "gods" who exist above criticism, stating that judicial oversight is protected under freedom of expression.
"Judges are not beyond scrutiny, particularly in a society where the judiciary has increasingly become a site of political contestation, selective morality, and inconsistency in the application of justice," the EFF stated.
"Deafening Silence" on Phala Phala Exposed
The EFF further slammed the HSF as a biased, liberal pressure group, exposing their alleged hypocrisy when it comes to defending the establishment.
The red berets pointed out that while the HSF is rushing to court to target Malema, they remained completely silent during President Cyril Ramaphosa's Phala Phala scandal—which involved allegations of millions in undeclared foreign currency, kidnapping, and abuse of state resources.
The EFF's View:
The HSF never rushed to court to demand accountability from Ramaphosa, nor did they complain when Parliament suppressed impeachment proceedings.
The Pattern :
The EFF argues that the HSF consistently gatekeeps the JSC, running to court whenever judicial transformation or political perspectives outside their own establishment views gain ground.
An Unelected Group Trying to Redesign the Law
The fighters warned that this court application is a massive institutional overreach. The HSF isn’t just targeting Malema; they are asking the Western Cape High Court to declare parts of the Judicial Service Commission Act invalid.
They want the court to force the JSC to adopt a binding code of conduct and punitive sanctions for commissioners.
The EFF argues that an unelected lobby group is trying to use the courts to hijack powers that belong strictly to Parliament, fundamentally reshaping constitutional bodies to fit their own ideological agenda.
Deflecting from Ramaphosa's Failures
Ultimately, the EFF views the timing of this lawsuit as a desperate political distraction.
Faced with a crashing economy, skyrocketing unemployment, and deep-seated poverty, the establishment is allegedly manufacturing "constitutional outrage" against Julius Malema to silence the loudest voice of opposition in the country.
The EFF maintains that it will not be intimidated by court cases sponsored by liberal elites. They have vowed to keep exposing corruption, challenging judicial inconsistency, and fighting for the right of ordinary South Africans to speak truth to power.
What is your take on this major political and legal showdown?
Is the HSF overstepping its bounds, or should JSC commissioners face stricter codes of conduct?
Drop your thoughts in the comments below!
MAKE_KASi_GREAT©®™
VISIT WWW.KASIBC.BLOGSPOT.COM
NEWS , AUDIO , VIDEO , EVENTS , TOURS , STORES
YOUR ADVERTS
Promote your Business KASIBC_AFRICA REACH MILLIONS of viewers DAILY!
Advertise With #KasiPeople
