
Constitutional Court Ruling on National Health Act, Reaffirms Commitment to Healthcare Reform
BY : CHANON LECODEY MERRICKS ONLINE EDITOR KASiBC_AFRiCA
ANC Notes Constitutional Court Ruling on National Health Act, Reaffirms Commitment to Healthcare Reform
JOHANNESBURG — The African National Congress (ANC) has formally noted the judgment delivered by the Constitutional Court regarding the National Health Act, reinforcing its commitment to the rule of law while maintaining that the ruling does not derail the implementation of universal healthcare.
The apex court's unanimous judgment, delivered on Monday, confirmed the constitutional invalidity of Sections 36 to 40 of the National Health Act. These specific sections contained the controversial "Certificate of Need" provisions, which would have required private hospitals, clinics, and medical practitioners to obtain government permission regarding where they could operate. In a statement, the governing party emphasized its respect for the judiciary and the principle of constitutional supremacy.
"The ANC respects the authority of the Constitutional Court and reaffirms its commitment to constitutionalism, the rule of law and the progressive realisation of the right to healthcare as provided for in Section 27 of the Constitution," the statement read.Crucially, the ANC clarified that the legal defeat does not translate into a rejection of its flagship National Health Insurance (NHI) policy.
"It is important to clarify that the Constitutional Court did not pronounce on or invalidate the broader National Health Insurance (NHI) framework or the constitutional objective of universal healthcare coverage," the party stated. "The judgment was confined specifically to Sections 36 to 40 of the National Health Act and the manner in which broad discretionary powers were vested without sufficient safeguards."
The apex court found the Certificate of Need provisions to be irrational and an unjustifiable limitation on the constitutional right to freely choose a trade, occupation, or profession. Opponents of the provision, including the trade union Solidarity and various private healthcare practitioners, hailed the ruling as a victory against coercive state control.
However, the ANC argued that the ruling should not be used by critics to protect the status quo of South Africa's deeply unequal medical landscape."The ruling therefore cannot be interpreted as a rejection of the imperative to transform South Africa’s deeply unequal healthcare system and ensure equitable access to quality healthcare for all citizens," the party added.
The ANC has called on Parliament and all relevant state organs to thoroughly study the apex court's findings to ensure full legal compliance moving forward.
The movement maintained that it will continue to pursue constitutionally sound reforms to rectify historical imbalances in healthcare access while balancing the rights of medical professionals.
NEWS , AUDIO , VIDEO , EVENTS , TOURS , STORES
VISIT WWW.KASIBC.BLOGSPOT.COM
YOUR ADVERTS
Promote your Business KASIBC_AFRICA REACH MILLIONS of viewers DAILY!
Advertise With #KasiPeople